Patient-reported outcome differences for navigated and robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty frequently do not achieve clinically important differences: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) using computer-assisted navigation (N-THA) and robot-assisted surgery (RA-THA) has been increasingly adopted to improve implant positioning and offset/leg-length restoration. Whether clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) compared to conventional THA (C-THA) are achieved with intraoperative technology has not been established. This systematic review aimed to assess whether published relative PROM improvements with technology use in THA achieved minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE/Cochrane Library were systematically reviewed for studies comparing PROMs for primary N-THA or RA-THA with C-THA as the control group. Relative improvement differences between groups were compared to established MCID values. Reported clinical and radiographic differences were assessed. Review of N-THA and RA-THA literature yielded 6 (n = 2580) and 10 (n = 2786) studies, respectively, for analyses. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in postoperative PROM scores were reported in 2/6 (33.3%) studies comparing N-THA with C-THA, though only 1 (16.7%) reported clinically significant relative improvements. Statistically significant improvements in postoperative PROMs were reported in 6/10 (60.0%) studies comparing RA-THA and C-THA, though none reported clinically significant relative improvements. Improved radiographic outcomes for N-THA and RA-THA were reported in 83.3% and 70.0% of studies, respectively. Only 1 study reported a significant improvement in revision rates with RA-THA as compared to C-THA. CONCLUSIONS: Reported PROM scores in studies comparing N-THA or RA-THA to C-THA often do not achieve clinically significant relative improvements. Future studies reporting PROMs should be interpreted in the context of validated MCID values to accurately establish the clinical impact of intraoperative technology.

Mid-term outcomes of a kinematically designed cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Advances in implant material and design have allowed for improvements in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes. A cruciate retaining (CR) TKA provides the least constraint of TKA designs by preserving the native posterior cruciate ligament. Limited research exists that has examined clinical outcomes or patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a large cohort of patients undergoing a CR TKA utilizing a kinematically designed implant. It was hypothesized that the studied CR Knee System would demonstrate favorable outcomes and a clinically significant improvement in pain and functional scores. AIM: To assess both short-term and mid-term clinical outcomes and PROMs of a novel CR TKA design. METHODS: A retrospective, multi-surgeon study identified 255 knees undergoing a TKA utilizing a kinematically designed CR Knee System (JOURNEY™ II CR; Smith and Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN) at an urban, academic medical institution between March 2015 and July 2021 with a minimum of two-years of clinical follow-up with an orthopedic surgeon. Patient demographics, surgical information, clinical outcomes, and PROMs data were collected via query of electronic medical records. The PROMs collected in the present study included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) scores. The significance of improvements in mean PROM scores from preoperative scores to scores collected at six months and two-years postoperatively was analyzed using Independent Samples t-tests. RESULTS: Of the 255 patients, 65.5% were female, 43.8% were White, and patients had an average age of 60.6 years. Primary osteoarthritis (96.9%) was the most common primary diagnosis. The mean surgical time was 105.3 minutes and mean length of stay was 2.1 d with most patients discharged home (92.5%). There were 18 emergency department (ED) visits within 90 d of surgery resulting in a 90 d ED visit rate of 7.1%, including a 2.4% orthopedic-related ED visit rate and a 4.7% non-orthopedic-related ED visit rate. There were three (1.2%) hospital readmissions within 90 d postoperatively. With a mean time to latest follow-up of 3.3 years, four patients (1.6%) required revision, two for arthrofibrosis, one for aseptic femoral loosening, and one for peri-prosthetic joint infection. There were significant improvements in KOOS JR, PROMIS Pain Intensity, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Mobility, and PROMIS Physical Health from preoperative scores to six month and two-year postoperative scores. CONCLUSION: The evaluated implant is an effective, novel design offering excellent outcomes and low complication rates. At a mean follow up of 3.3 years, four patients required revisions, three aseptic and one septic, resulting in an overall implant survival rate of 98.4% and an aseptic survival rate of 98.8%. The results of our study demonstrate the utility of this kinematically designed implant in the setting of primary TKA.

The Impact of Obesity on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes When Performed by High-Volume Surgeons-A Propensity Matched Analysis From a High-Volume Urban Center.

BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest that obesity does not impact surgical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty performed by high-volume (HV) surgeons. However, this effect has yet to be studied in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of patient obesity on THA outcomes when surgery is performed by HV surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary, elective THA between January 2012 and December 2022 with a HV surgeon (top 25% of surgeons by number of annual primary THA) was performed. Patients were stratified by their body mass index (BMI) into 3 cohorts: BMI ≥ 40 (morbidly obese [MO]), 30 ≤ BMI < 40 (obese), and BMI < 30 (nonobese); and 1:1:1 propensity matched based on baseline characteristics. A total of 13,223 patients were evaluated, of which 669 patients were included in the final matched analysis (223 patients per group). The average number of annual THAs performed for HV surgeons was 171 cases. RESULTS: The MO patients had significantly longer surgical times (P < .001) and hospital lengths of stay (P < .001). Rates of 90-day readmissions (P = .211) and all-cause, septic, and aseptic revisions at the latest follow-up (P = .268, P = .903, and P = .168, respectively) were comparable between groups. In a subanalysis for non-HV surgeons, MO patients had a significantly greater risk of revision (P = .021) and trended toward significantly greater readmissions (P = .056). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes and complication rates after THA performed by a HV surgeon are similar regardless of patient obesity status. Patients who have MO may experience improved outcomes and reduced procedural risks if they are referred to HV surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

"Stuck in the middle": the missing lumbosacral link in total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Spinopelvic mobility drives functional acetabular position, influencing dislocation risk after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients have been described as "stuck sitting" or "stuck standing" based on pelvic tilt (PT). We hypothesised that some patients are "stuck in the middle," meaning their PT changes minimally from sitting to standing - increasing their risk of dislocation. METHODS: We reviewed 195 patients with standing and sitting whole body radiographs prior to THA. Standing anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPT) and standing and sitting sacral slope (SS) were measured and used to calculate sitting APPT. Normal standing and sitting were defined as APPT >-10° and <-20°, respectively. Spinal stiffness was classified as <10° change in sacral slope between sitting and standing. Patients were categorised as: (A) able to fully sit and stand; (B) "stuck sitting" - able to fully sit; unable to fully stand; (C) "stuck standing" - able to fully stand; unable to fully sit; or (D) "stuck in the middle" - unable to sit or stand fully. RESULTS: 84 patients could sit and stand normally (A), 22 patients were stuck sitting (B), 76 patients were stuck standing (C), and 13 patients were stuck in the middle (D). While 111 patients (56.9%) were considered stuck, only 58 patients (29.7%) met criteria for spinal stiffness. DISCUSSION: We identified a subset of patients with stiff spines and abnormal PT in both sitting and standing, including 37.1% of patients who would be classified as "stuck sitting" based only on standing radiographs. Placing acetabular components in less than anatomic anteversion in these patients may increase posterior dislocation risk.

The Financial Burden of Patient Comorbidities on Total Hip Arthroplasties-A Matched Cohort Analysis of High Comorbidity Burden and Non-High Comorbidity Burden Patients.

BACKGROUND: The impact of increased patient comorbidities on the cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THAs) is lacking. This study aimed to compare revenue, costs, and short-term (90 days) surgical outcomes between patients who have and do not have a high comorbidity burden (HCB). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 14,949 patients who underwent an elective, unilateral THA between 2012 and 2021. Patients were stratified into HCB (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 5 and American Society of Anesthesiology scores of 3 or 4) and non-HCB groups, and were further 1:1 propensity matched based on baseline characteristics. Perioperative data, revenue, costs, and contribution margins (CMs) of the inpatient episode were compared between groups. Also, 90-day readmissions and revisions were compared between groups. Of the 11,717 patients who had available financial data (n = 1,017 HCB, n = 10,700 non-HCB), 1,914 patients were included in the final matched analyses (957 per group). RESULTS: Total (P < .001) and direct (P < .001) costs were significantly higher for HCB patients. Comparable revenue between cohorts (P = .083) resulted in a significantly decreased CM in the HCB patient group (P < .001). The HCB patients were less likely to be discharged home (P < .001) and had significantly higher 90-day readmission rates (P = .049). CONCLUSIONS: Increased THA costs for HCB patients were not matched by increased revenue, resulting in decreased CM. Higher rates of nonhome discharge and readmissions in the HCB population add to the additional financial burden. Adjustments to the current reimbursement models should better account for the increased financial burden of HCB patients undergoing THA and ensure access to care for all patient populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Comparing Outcomes of Bicruciate-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Bicruciate-stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore normal kinematics by replicating the function of both cruciate ligaments. Conventional cruciate-retaining (CR) design in TKA has shown previous clinical success with lower complication rates. This study compared the patient-reported outcomes between the BCS and CR TKA designs. Methods: This retrospective study examined patients who underwent primary TKA using a CR or a BCS implant. Patient demographics, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were compared between two cohorts. Patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed using independent samples t-tests. Results: There were no significant preoperative demographic differences between groups. The CR cohort (n = 756) had significantly higher average KOOS, JR Scores compared to the BCS cohort (n = 652) at 3 months (59.7 ± 3.8 vs. 53.0 ± 3.9, p < 0.001) and 2 years (62.6 ± 8.0 vs. 53.8 ± 6.7, p = 0.001) after TKA. Within the cohort, KOOS, JR delta differences were not significant for CR when comparing patient scores 3 months to 1 year after surgery. Meanwhile, the BCS patients did show significant delta improvement (4.1 ± 1.9, p = 0.030) when compared 3 months to 1 year after surgery. One year postoperatively, the BCS cohort (n = 134) showed a significantly higher average FJS score (49.5 ± 31.4, vs. 36.8 ± 28.5, p = 0.028) than the CR cohort (n = 203). Both cohorts displayed a significant difference in delta improvements within their respective cohort when measuring FJS from 3 months to 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after surgery. Conclusions: The CR cohort performed better on average, compared to the BCS cohort in measures of KOOS, JR scores at the 2-year follow-up. The BCS cohort performed marginally better regarding FJS only at 1-year follow-up.

Innovations in the Isolation and Treatment of Biofilms in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Comprehensive Review of Current and Emerging Therapies in Bone and Joint Infection Management.

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a devastating complication of joint arthroplasty surgeries that are often complicated by biofilm formation. The development of biofilms makes PJI treatment challenging as they create a barrier against antibiotics and host immune responses. This review article provides an overview of the current understanding of biofilm formation, factors that contribute to their production, and the most common organisms involved in this process. This article focuses on the identification of biofilms, as well as current methodologies and emerging therapies in the management of biofilms in PJI.

Does experience with total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients effect surgical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Literature examining the risks, benefits, and potential complications of TKA in morbidly obese patients is conflicting. Surgeons with more experience performing TKA on morbidly obese patients may generate superior outcomes. This study sought to assess whether complication rates and implant survivorship in morbidly obese TKA patients varies between high (HV) and low (LV) volume surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to include all morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40) patients that underwent primary TKA between January 2016 and July 2021 at our high-volume center. Demographics and clinical outcomes were collected and compared between surgeons with a higher morbidly obese TKA volume (> 10 annual cases) and surgeons with a lower morbidly obese TKA volume. RESULTS: A total of 964 patients (HV 91 [9.4%], LV 873 [90.6%]) were identified. The HV surgeon and LV surgeons had an average annual volume of 15.3 and 5.2 cases, respectively. The average BMI for the HV and LV cohorts were 44.5 ± 3.7 and 44.0 ± 3.6, respectively (p = 0.160). The HV surgeon had significantly lower operative times (105.7 ± 17.4 vs. 110.7 ± 29.6 min, p = 0.018), and a lower 90-day minor complication rate (0.0% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.035). For patients with at least 2-year follow-up, all-cause revision (3.4% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.149) and revision due to PJI (0.0% vs. 5.8%, 0.193) rates were numerically lower in the HV cohort. Improvements in KOOS, JR and VR-12 scores were similar at 3-month and 1-year follow-up. Freedom from all-cause revision (HV: 96.6% vs. LV: 80.4%, p = 0.175) and revision due to PJI (HV: 100.0% vs. LV: 93.6%, p = 0.190, p = 0.190) at latest follow-up did not statistically differ between groups. CONCLUSION: The HV surgeon had significantly lower operative time and 90-day minor complication rates and numerically lower all-cause revision and revision due to PJI rates when performing TKA in morbidly obese patients. Surgeon's experience may affect surgical outcomes after TKA in morbidly obese patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Risk Stratification in Orthopaedics.

Proper predictive tools are essential to guide patient selection, optimization, category of surgical admission (inpatient, outpatient surgery), and discharge disposition, and predict the risk of readmissions and complications after orthopaedic procedures. Therefore, identification and optimization of patients' perioperative risk for surgery is essential, and understanding these basic concepts is crucial to maximizing patient care quality. It is important to define risk, stratify the existing preoperative attributes, and review key concepts of patient-specific risk calculation and documentation.

Impact of a Novel Navigational Technology on Short-Term Patient Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty A Propensity Matched Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The use of intraoperative technology is increasing among orthopedic surgeons in the United States. However, there is continued debate as to whether intraoperative technologies provide clinical benefits in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study sought to determine whether the use of a novel intraoperative navigation technology produces equivalent or superior short-term outcomes compared to conventional technique. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients underwent primary TKA with a novel imageless intraoperative navigational technology between October 2019 and January 2020 at a single, urban, orthopedic specialty hospital. A 1:1 cohort propensity matching was performed with patients with similar demographics who underwent primary TKA without the use of technology. Demographics, clinical data, as well as preoperative and 3-month Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) scores were collected. Demographic differences, clinical data, and mean KOOS, JR scores were assessed using chi-squared analysis for categorical variables and independent sample t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Upon 1:1 cohort matching, patients in both the navigational cohorts and non-navigational cohorts were statistically similar demographically. Length of stay (2.11 vs. 1.71 days; p = 0.108), surgical time (108.89 vs. 101.19 minutes, p = 0.066), discharge disposition (p = 0.675), 90- day readmissions (4 vs. 4, p = 0.999), and 90-day reoperations (2 vs. 2, p = 0.999) did not statistically differ between the two matched cohorts. Additionally, KOOS, JR scores evaluated between the two cohorts preoperatively (46.06 vs. 45.17, p = 0.836) and at 3-month follow-up (57.63 vs. 55.06, p = 0.580) were similar. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the use of this novel intraoperative navigational technology yields similar short-term TKA results when compared to conventionally performed TKA. Further studies are required to validate new technologies and determine their effect on long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Are Patient Outcomes Affected by Surgeon Experience With Total Hip Arthroplasty in Morbidly Obese Patients?

Background: Surgeons with high volume (HV) of total hip arthroplasty (THA) have seen better outcomes than low volume (LV) surgeons. However, literature regarding surgeon volume and outcomes in morbidly obese THA patients is scarce. This study examines the association between surgeon volume with THA in morbidly obese patients (body mass index ≥40) and their clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all morbidly obese patients who underwent primary THA at our institution between March 2012 and July 2020 with 2 years of follow-up. Clinical outcomes were compared between the HV (HVa, top quartile of surgeons with the highest overall yearly THA volume) and LV (LVa) surgeons. Similar analysis was run comparing HV of morbidly obese THA (HVo, top quartile of surgeons with the highest yearly morbidly obese THA volume) and LV of morbidly obese THA (LVo) surgeons. Results: Six hundred and forty-three patients and 33 surgeons were included. HVa surgeons had significantly shorter length of stay and increased home discharge. HVa and HVo surgeons had significantly shorter operative times. There were no significant differences in overall 90-day major and minor complications or clinical differences in patient-reported outcomes. Revision rates and freedom from revisions did not differ between groups at 2-year follow-up. Conclusions: HVa surgeons had significantly lower length of stay and operative times and increased discharge to home. There was no significant decrease in complications or revisions in either comparison model. Complications, revision rates, and patient satisfaction in morbidly obese patients who undergo THA may be independent of surgeon volume.

Does the geriatric nutritional risk index predict complication rates and implant survivorship in revision total joint arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition is associated with poorer outcomes after revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA), though no universal metric for assessing malnutrition in rTJA patients has been reported. This study sought to determine if malnutrition as defined by the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) can independently predict short-term complication rates and re-revision risk in patients undergoing rTJA. METHODS: All patients ≥ 65 years old undergoing rTJA from 2011 to 2021 at a single orthopaedic specialty hospital were identified. Preoperative albumin, height, and weight were used to calculate GNRI. Based on the calculated GNRI value, patients were stratified into three groups: normal nutrition (GNRI > 98), moderate malnutrition (GNRI 92-98), and severe malnutrition (GNRI < 92). Chi-squared and independent samples t-tests were used to compare groups. RESULTS: A total of 531 rTJA patients were included. Patients with normal nutrition were younger (p < 0.001), had higher BMI (p < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients with severe and moderate malnutrition had longer length of stay (p < 0.001), were less likely to be discharged home (p = 0.049), and had higher 90-day major complication (p = 0.02) and readmission (p = 0.005) rates than those with normal nutrition. 90-day revision rates were similar. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, patients with severe and moderate malnutrition had worse survivorship free of all-cause re-revision at 1-year (p = 0.001) and 2-year (p = 0.002) follow-up compared to those with normal nutrition. CONCLUSION: Moderate and severe malnutrition, as defined by GNRI, independently predicted higher complication and revision rates in rTJA patients. This suggests that the GNRI may serve as an effective screening tool for nutritional status in patients undergoing rTJA.

The Impact of Surgeon Proficiency in Non-English-Speaking Patients' Primary Language on Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Non-English-speaking patients face increased communication barriers when undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Surgeons may learn or have proficiency in languages spoken among their patients to improve communication. This study investigated the effect of surgeon-patient language concordance on outcomes after TJA. We conducted a single-institution, retrospective review of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) whose preferred language was not English. Patients were stratified based on whether their surgeon spoke their preferred language (language concordant [LC]) or not (language discordant [LD]). Baseline characteristics, length of stay, discharge disposition, revision rate, readmission rate, and patient-reported outcomes (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement [KOOS, JR], Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement [HOOS, JR], and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS]) were compared. A total of 3390 patients met inclusion criteria, with 855 receiving THA and 2535 receiving TKA. Among patients receiving THA, 440 (51.5%) saw a LC provider and 415 (48.5%) saw a LD provider. Those in the LC group had higher HOOS, JR scores at 1 year postoperatively (67.4 vs 49.3, P=.003) and were more likely to be discharged home (77.5% vs 69.9%, P=.013). Among patients receiving TKA, 1051 (41.5%) received LC care, whereas 1484 (58.5%) received LD care. There were no differences in outcome between the LC and LD TKA groups. Patients receiving THA with surgeons who spoke their language had improved patient-reported outcomes and were more commonly discharged home after surgery. Language concordance did not change outcomes in TKA. Optimizing language concordance for patients receiving TJA may improve postoperative outcomes. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):334-339.].

Creating Consensus in the Definition of Spinopelvic Mobility.

INTRODUCTION: The term "spinopelvic mobility" is most often applied to motion within the spinopelvic segment. It has also been used to describe changes in pelvic tilt between various functional positions, which is influenced by motion at the hip, knee, ankle and spinopelvic segment. In the interest of establishing a consistent language for spinopelvic mobility, we sought to clarify and simplify its definition to create consensus, improve communication, and increase consistency with research into the hip-spine relationship. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the Medline (PubMed) library to identify all existing articles pertaining to spinopelvic mobility. We reported on the varying definitions of spinopelvic mobility including how different radiographic imaging techniques are used to define mobility. RESULTS: The search term "spinopelvic mobility" returned a total of 72 articles. The frequency and context for the varying definitions of mobility were reported. 41 papers used standing and upright relaxed-seated radiographs without the use of extreme positioning, and 17 papers discussed the use of extreme positioning to define spinopelvic mobility. DISCUSSION: Our review suggests that the definitions of spinopelvic mobility is not consistent in the majority of published literature. We suggest descriptions of spinopelvic mobility independently consider spinal motion, hip motion, and pelvic position, while recognizing and describing their interdependence.

Multiply revised TKAs have worse outcomes compared to index revision TKAs.

Aims: Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a technically challenging and costly procedure. It is well-documented that primary TKA (pTKA) have better survivorship than rTKA; however, we were unable to identify any studies explicitly investigating previous rTKA as a risk factor for failure following rTKA. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes following rTKA between patients undergoing index rTKA and those who had been previously revised. Methods: This retrospective, observational study reviewed patients who underwent unilateral, aseptic rTKA at an academic orthopaedic speciality hospital between June 2011 and April 2020 with > one-year of follow-up. Patients were dichotomized based on whether this was their first revision procedure or not. Patient demographics, surgical factors, postoperative outcomes, and re-revision rates were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 663 cases were identified (486 index rTKAs and 177 multiply revised TKAs). There were no differences in demographics, rTKA type, or indication for revision. Multiply revised patients had significantly longer rTKA operative times (p < 0.001), and were more likely to be discharged to an acute rehabilitation centre (6.2% vs 4.5%) or skilled nursing facility (29.9% vs 17.5%; p = 0.003). Patients who had been multiply revised were also significantly more likely to have subsequent reoperation (18.1% vs 9.5%; p = 0.004) and re-revision (27.1% vs 18.1%; p = 0.013). The number of previous revisions did not correlate with the number of subsequent reoperations (r = 0.038; p = 0.670) or re-revisions (r = -0.102; p = 0.251). Conclusion: Multiply revised TKA had worse outcomes, with higher rates of facility discharge, longer operative times, and greater reoperation and re-revision rates compared to index rTKA.

Impact of time to revision total knee arthroplasty on outcomes following aseptic failure.

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have demonstrated an association between time to revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and indication; however, the impact of early versus late revision on post-operative outcomes has not been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study examined patients who underwent unilateral, aseptic rTKA at an academic orthopedic hospital between 6/2011 and 4/2020 with > 1-year of follow-up. Patients were early revisions if they were revised within 2 years of primary TKA (pTKA) or late revisions if revised after greater than 2 years. Patient demographics, surgical factors, and post-operative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: 470 rTKA were included (199 early, 271 late). Early rTKA patients were younger by 2.5 years (p = 0.002). The predominant indications for early rTKA were instability (28.6%) and arthrofibrosis/stiffness (26.6%), and the predominant indications for late rTKA were aseptic loosening (45.8%) and instability (26.2%; p < 0.001). Late rTKA had longer operative times (119.20 ± 51.94 vs. 103.93 ± 44.66 min; p < 0.001). There were no differences in rTKA type, disposition, hospital length of stay, all-cause 90-day emergency department visits and readmissions, reoperations, and number of re-revisions. CONCLUSIONS: Aseptic rTKA performed before 2 years had different indications but demonstrated similar outcomes to those performed later. Early revisions had shorter surgical times, which could be attributed to differences in rTKA indication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective observational analysis.

Outcomes of medicaid patients undergoing TJA with previous positive urine toxicology screens.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with positive preoperative urine toxicology (utox) screens prior to total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have higher readmission rates, greater complication rates, and longer hospital stays compared to patients with negative screens. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of postponing surgery for patients with positive preoperative utox in the Medicaid population. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study reviewed the Medicaid ambulatory database at a large, academic orthopedic specialty hospital for patients with a utox screen prior to TJA from 2012 to 2020. Patients were categorized into three groups: (1) controls with negative preoperative utox or a utox consistent with prescription medications (Utox-) with TJA completed as scheduled; (2) positive preoperative utox with TJA rescheduled and surgery completed on a later date (R-utox+); (3) positive preoperative utox inconsistent with prescription medications with TJA completed as scheduled (S-utox+). Primary outcomes included mortality, 90-day readmission rate, complication rate, and length of stay. RESULTS: Of the 300 records reviewed, 185 did not meet inclusion criteria. The remaining 115 patients included 80 (69.6%) Utox-, 5 (6.3%) R-utox+, and 30 (37.5%) S-utox+. Mean follow-up time was 49.6 months. Hospital stays trended longer in the Utox- group (3.7 ± 2.0 days vs. 3.1 ± 1.6 S-utox+ vs.2.5 ± 0.4 R-utox+, p = 0.20). Compared to the R-utox+group, the S-utox+ group trended toward lower home discharge rates (p = 0.20), higher in-hospital complication rates (p = 0.85), and more all-cause 90-day emergency department visits (p = 0.57). There were no differences in postoperative opioid utilization between groups (p = 0.319). Duration of postoperative narcotic use trended toward being longer in the Utox- patients (820.7 ± 1073.8 days vs. 684.6 ± 1491.8 S-utox+ vs. 585.1 ± 948.3 R-utox+, p = 0.585). Surgical time (p = 0.045) and revision rates (p = 0.72) trended toward being higher in the S-utox+ group. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid patients with positive preoperative utox who had surgeries postponed trended towards shorter hospital stays and greater home discharge rates. Larger studies should be conducted to analyze the implications of a positive preoperative utox on risk profiles and outcomes following TJA in the Medicaid population. Study design Retrospective cohort study.

Trends in Complications and Outcomes in Patients Aged 65 Years and Younger Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: Data From the American Joint Replacement Registry.

This study sought to determine common complications and the rates of readmission and revision in total hip arthroplasty patients younger than 65 years. Using the American Joint Replacement Registry, we conducted a retrospective review of all THAs in patients aged 18 to 65 years from 2012 to 2020. We excluded patients aged older than 65 years, revisions, oncologic etiology, conversion from prior surgery, and nonelective cases. Primary outcomes included cumulative revision rate, 90-day readmission rate, and reason for revision. The Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analysis were used. Five thousand one hundred fifty-three patients were included. The average age was 56.7 years (SD 7.8 years), 51% were female, 85% were White, and 89% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0 (1 = 7%, >2 = 4%). The mean follow-up was 39.57 months. Fifty-three patients (1.0%) underwent revision. Seventy-four patients (1.4%) were readmitted within 90 days. Revision was more common in Black patients (P = 0.023). Survivorship was 99% (95% confidence interval, 98.7 to 99.3) and 99% (95% confidence interval, 98.5 to 99.3) at 5 and 8 years, respectively. Infection (21%), instability (15%), periprosthetic fracture (15%), and aseptic loosening (9%) were the most common indications for revision. Total hip arthroplasty performed in young and presumed active patients had a 99% survivorship at 8 years. A long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate survival trends in this growing population.

Comparison of traditional PS versus kinematically designs in primary total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Kinematically designed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore normal kinematics by replicating the function of both cruciate ligaments. Traditional posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA designs, on the other hand, simplify knee kinematics and may improve TKA cost-effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent primary TKA using either a traditional PS or kinematically designed TKA. METHODS: This retrospective study examined all patients who underwent primary TKA using either a kinematically or a traditional PS designed TKA implant, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patient demographics, complications, readmissions, revision rates and causes, range of motion (ROM) and patient reported outcomes (KOOS, JR) were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed to estimate freedom from revision, and multivariate regression was performed to control for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 396 TKAs [173 (43.7%) with a kinematic design, 223 (56.3%) with a traditional design] with a mean follow-up of 3.48 ± 1.51 years underwent analysis. Revision rates did not differ between groups (9.8% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.418). In Kaplan-Meier analysis at 2-year follow-up, freedom from all-cause revision (96.4% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.139) were similar between groups. The two cohorts had no significant difference in aseptic loosening at 2 years (99.6% vs. 97.1, p = 0.050) and at latest follow up (92.7% vs. 96.4%, p = 0.279). KOOS, JR scores and post-operative ROM were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated similar mid-term outcomes following the use of both a kinematically designed and a traditionally designed implant in primary TKA patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective study-III.